Member-only story

Tort Reform: Point-Counterpoint

Ivan Cox

·2.6k Followers· Follow

Published in Tort Reform (Point/Counterpoint (Chelsea Hardcover))

4 min read

1.2k View Claps

61 Respond

Save

Listen

Tort reform is a broad term that encompasses a variety of proposed changes to the civil justice system. Proponents of tort reform argue that the current system is too costly, inefficient, and unfair. They claim that it leads to excessive litigation, high insurance premiums, and a decline in economic activity. Opponents of tort reform, on the other hand, argue that it would erode important consumer protections and make it more difficult for victims of negligence to obtain compensation.

Tort Reform (Point/Counterpoint (Chelsea Hardcover))

by Paul Ruschmann

4.4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1795 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	128 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

Arguments for Tort Reform

Proponents of tort reform argue that the current civil justice system is too costly and inefficient. They point to the fact that the United States has one of the highest rates of litigation in the world. They also argue that the discovery process is too expensive and time-consuming, and that jury awards are often excessive.

Proponents of tort reform also argue that the current system is unfair. They claim that it is too easy for plaintiffs to file lawsuits, and that defendants are often forced to settle cases even when they are not liable. They also argue that the system is biased against businesses, and that it discourages innovation and economic growth.

Arguments Against Tort Reform

Opponents of tort reform argue that it would erode important consumer protections. They claim that tort lawsuits are an important way for victims of negligence to obtain compensation for their injuries. They also argue that tort lawsuits help to deter businesses from engaging in dangerous or reckless behavior.

Opponents of tort reform also argue that it would make it more difficult for small businesses to compete. They claim that large corporations would be able to afford the costs of litigation, while small businesses would be forced to close their doors. They also argue that tort reform would lead to a decline in the quality of products and services, as businesses would no longer be held accountable for their actions.

The debate over tort reform is a complex one, with both sides making valid points. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to support tort reform is a matter of individual opinion.

Additional Resources

* [American Tort Reform Association](https://www.atra.org/) * [Association for Justice](https://www.justice.org/) * [National Association of Consumer Advocates](https://www.naca.net/) * [U.S. Chamber of Commerce](https://www.uschamber.com/)

Tort Reform (Point/Counterpoint (Chelsea Hardcover))

by Paul Ruschmann

4.4 out of 5